🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an observance that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has developed a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate gatherings where Black people are paid to talk to Caucasian groups about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The surge has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in autumn in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The period has transformed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the observance is celebrated is a indication of the political moment. How it evolves is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how critical it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a legislator feels empowered to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, far-right parties are expanding in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the US, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A effort to scrub African American heritage and legacy from the records is ongoing. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

Given these circumstances, the month represents how insufficiently it can be influential if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized festivities of historical achievements, rather than addressing the conditions of the current era. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. Denise Miller, a professor at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month completely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an time that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an foundation that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) included in school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not evade political issues, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is mere awareness of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Establishments who mark it should not be comforted with the passive language of hidden discrimination and alertness to subtle slights, but challenged by the threats that impact society if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and reactive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.