🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.